Favorite Films: Cool Characters

What defines cool? A lot of things I suppose. Sometimes it’s the story or sometimes it’s the atmosphere but most of the time when we think cool, we think characters. The following films contain characters, both heroes and villains alike, that epitomize the meaning of cool in movies.

Le Samourai (directed by Jean-Pierre Melville)

If there’s one film that displays what cool looks like in movies, Jean-Pierre Melville’s gorgeously shot and elegantly-paced Le Samourai is it. The way Alain Delon plays a professional killer for hire is as classy as killer’s can get. Slickly dressed in suit, tie and hat with a style and grace that defines French elegance, Delon’s Jef Costello magnetizes the audience on screen. Despite the stakes — murder, doubt, and betrayal — he never breaks a sweat. Instead Jeff Costello always remains calm and collected, detached and almost emotionless. He defines the Japanese way of the warrior — Bushido — and is loyal to his trade, his craft. This is where his honour lies and the price is loneliness which is made loud and clear by Melville’s direction which is tight yet relaxed, as compositions define moments more than plots points or physical action. Here silence speaks and the character’s coolness shines.

Enter The Dragon (directed by Robert Clouse)

There’s nothing special about the story, directing or acting in Robert Clouse’s Enter The Dragon. One can say the directing is ham or amateurish at best. Some of it even downright silly. The film was reluctantly made and financed by Warner Bros costing only US$850,000 but went on to gross over US$90 million, an over 10000% return. Of course, the only reason it excels is the only (and ultimate) reason to watch it: its star, the immortal Bruce Lee. Here, the Little Dragon is introduced to the world in glorious form. With much of the fight scenes storyboarded and choreographed by Lee himself, the action shines with power and authenticity. Supporting cast members Shik Kien (who plays the villain Han), Jim Kelly and Bolo Yeung do add to the cool flavor of the film but ultimately this is all about Bruce. Even to this day, almost 47 years after his death (which happened before the movie’s release, so Bruce himself never saw the film) there’s still nobody like him on screen (or off) despite the endless copycats and homages, some of which were respectful while others were downright offensive. In Enter The Dragon Lee is intelligent, charming, beautiful and absolutely explosive. The camera loves his lean, muscular body. He’s magnetic both in his stillness and sudden explosiveness. To this day, Bruce Lee defines cool for not just every asian on the planet but for almost every practicing marital artist/fighter.

Heat (directed by Michael Mann)

I love Heat. Not only was it a chance to see two rarely seen together superstars of Hollywood act in the same shots, it defines what’s so cool about cops and robbers. And there’s nobody that films Los Angeles like Michael Mann does. The tight editing, sharp pin-pointed camera work and excellent sound editing elevate the senses. Along with dynamite performances from a large and talented crew, Mann’s film is so cool it almost glorifies the violent action. But in truth, the film is about inevitabilities and characters — like De Niro’s elusive bank robber who seems to be buying time for something more and Pacino’s detective who can’t keep a marriage together because he spends all his time chasing bad guys like De Niro. Here, smart men — men whose lives are lost in the engrossing action of their work — continue to do things that make no sense but they’re so good at it that nothing else in life compares. With loyalties, friendships and love on the line, the characters — all of them — struggle with their own individual dilemmas. With an excellent supporting cast of Val Kilmer, Ashley Judd, Tom Sizemore, Jonathan Pryce, Jon Voight, Natalie Portman and Dennis Haysbert, Heat is sizeably long but engrossing. The bank robbery finale might be the most viscerally awesome gun-fire sequence in film history.

The Professional (directed by Luc Besson)

Luc Besson’s masterful killer-for-hire story has become a modern-day classic. Brimming with strong acting, excellent direction and brilliant sound editing, the audience is carried briskly through continuous action while carrying with it a real heart and empathy for its characters. The Professional showcases three wonderful stars: the highly underrated Jean Reno, the dynamically gifted Gary Oldman and a very young Natalie Portman in a star-turning performance. Immediately the film grabs you in its world of tragic circumstances and endearing characters all set in NYC. There’s great contrast here; the hero and expert killer Leon, played by Reno is lethal yet simple-minded, Oldman’s villain is a drug-induced cop who loves Beethoven and the young 12 year-old Matilda who may be small but carries a strength and maturity that’s both charming and dangerous. Rounding out the cast in a supporting role is the always great Danny Aielo who plays Leon’s Little Italy employer. Released as Leon in Europe, The Professional is as cool as it is fun and is my favorite film from director Luc Besson.

The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly (directed by Sergio Leone)

The most famous of Sergio Leone’s Spaghetti westerns, The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly is far from perfect. The pace drags a bit in the early going and the detailed montages of its three main characters take a while to play out. The fact that the budget was low and the side characters being dubbed (as much of the supporting cast didn’t speak English) do date and take away from the film’s enjoyability. But when the moments sit with its stars Clint Eastwood, Lee Van Cleef and Eli Wallach and especially when two or more of them are on screen together, the film raises itself to another level. Eastwood’s “man with no name” is absolutely the coolest cowboy ever. Eastwood’s gunslinger is the good guy but he’s no saint — after conning reward money from the Sheriff’s office by both catching and releasing his convicted criminal partner Eli Wallach, he abandons him in the scorching hot desert. Wallach’s Tucco is a character with wit, charm and humour but he’s no coward. The scenes “Blondie” and Tucco share together are shots to be savoured. To round out the cast, Lee Van Cleef plays the kind of villain you would never want to face; he’s cold, intelligent and efficiently ruthless. He’s so cool, you wish he was a good guy (like he is in a Leone’s other Western classic For A Few Dollars More which is also, arguably, the better film). I like that Leone grounds the film during the civil war as it gives it historical perspective and a kind of philosophical depth to the film as we question the meaning of all this violence. Which is worse? Men who lie, steal and kill because they are left with no options or the governments and merchants who kill in the thousands all for ideals no one truly understands? In the end, it’s only money that matters and the films conclusion summarizes as much. And what an ending! Shot with creativity, technical brilliance and beauty, the climatic three-way gun draw between the film’s stars might be one of the most original scenes in film history. Accompanied by Ennio Morricone’s iconic score, the film is a classic.

A Better Tomorrow (directed by John Woo)

I still remember seeing John Woo’s A Better Tomorrow for the first time at the theatre. It was an unforgettable experience. It was, at least for me, the first time Hong Kong cinema got serious about movies. Taking the age old cops and gangsters genre John Woo, working with a great script that he also wrote, created characters with so much charm, heart and authenticity that the world fell in love with them. 1970’s kung fu action star Ti Lung plays “Ho-guo,” the honorable big brother of Hong Kong’s most powerful mafia. Along with Chow Yun-Fat who plays his business partner Mark, the two make for the most likeable and coolest gangsters on the silver screen. All seems good until a deal goes wrong and betrayal reveals the inevitable. Ho winds up in jail and Mark takes revenge for his friend by going on a ruthless killing spree in Taiwan but ends up disabled. And just like that, their mafia reign is over. The late Leslie Cheung plays Ho’s little brother, a young burgeoning cop who once idolized him but now sees his sibling as his enemy. It’s a great story about ambition and the boundaries between brothers in blood and brotherhood forged in battle. The film is a classic in Asia and has inspired the likes of Quentin Tarantino to make/write films like Reservoir Dogs and True Romance. This is a film I never tire of watching despite the fact that so many filmmakers (on both sides of the Pacific) have copied its style and content. Chow Yun-fat’s electric performance alone makes it worth seeing over and over again.

Wanna see more excellent film recommendations? Check out my lists of other Favorite Films here.

Looking at Our Own Work

A close up of Pablo Picasso seen here working on his gigantic (over 25 ft long) mural masterpiece, Guernica.

“You could learn more about yourself from studying your own work than by looking at anyone else’s.” — Robert Henri, Artist

To look, and to do so with honesty and clarity, at our own work is one of the trickiest things to do as an artist. With our minds so easily preoccupied with our ambitions and expectations, it is quite difficult to be truly objective in our analysis. We are often “too close” to the work. That said, it is absolutely essential that we do so. Like taking stock with our lives, it is good and proper to periodically see where our work is in its level of clarity and execution as well as where we’re at in terms of our own creative development.

A young James Baxter at work. 2D masters such as Baxter are always periodically flipping their work to see how it plays, before they play it (on film).

Of course, as has been mentioned here before, the most obvious way to get immediate feedback is to get it from other people — colleagues, supervisors, teachers, coaches etc. If we want our work to read to others, and this is most certainly true working in a commercial field or on a project where the work needs to trigger a response from a larger audience, then that is by far the best option (we only have to be mindful that all opinions are biased). However, if the work is more personal, or even innovative, feedback from others isn’t always best or appropriate. Trends and methods come and go in art as they do in everything else in a market economy. Common people, including your typical work colleague, can often have common minds — minds stuck on set ways of seeing. And sometimes, it isn’t even possible to find feedback from others. For a fresher perspective, sometimes we have to look elsewhere or try something else. But the first thing we must do is to stop and move away from the work. Afterwards, we can begin to look to more creative ways to self-critique.

“All truly great thoughts are conceived while walking.” ― Friedrich Nietzsche, Philosopher

Ways of Self-Critique:

Here are some suggestions (and I apologize again making another list but it is the simplest way to present options). Some are more technical while others are more ethereal:

1) Look at your work from a different perspective. Flip the horizontal (or use a mirror). Or look at it from a distance. If you’re an animator, check other camera views: perspective, side, front and top views. Consider changing the lighting/rendering to silhouete or toon shade option. Flaws in work are often revealed this way with striking obviousness.

2) Look at it as if it’s not yours. Does it make any sense if you didn’t know the vision, story or ideas involved? Never forget that your default state is that you know what it’s about and that this knowledge blinds you to seeing the truth. Breakdown aspects of it and critique that element exclusively and objectively as possible. For example, if animating dialogue, take the sound away and just look at the images and movement. Does the acting still read?

3) Go thru the checklists. Does it meet your goals and all the requirements you need to make it work? Does it hit all the director’s notes/concerns? Did you ACE the shot? And what about the flaws? Has the checklist of errors — and you should always make one for each shot — been addressed?

4) Compare your work to something similar (in style or idea) that is really good. How does your work hold up next to it? How does it compare to that of your colleagues who consistently do good work? Consider also comparing it to the works of old masters. This has been a time-tested method for artists who would become new masters in their own era. When I joined the 3D animation world, there were few if any established 3D animators of note. Besides pushing each other, me and most of my colleagues had to compare our work with the higher standards of long-established classical 2D masters. Time-tested art is often far superior to that of contemporary work and trendy tastes.

5) Compare your work to your older work. When it comes to development, nothing is as important. There should be marked improvement. If there hasn’t been, again, ask why? When this happens, the problems are usually more deep-seated and possibly environment-induced — seek professional coaching advice if so. Bad thinking not only inhibits growth, it can reverse it. Otherwise, if you’re better today than you were yesterday, you’re off to a good start.

Conclusion:

It’s important to self-assess. To do good art requires honest reflection on the work and ourselves personally. It’s not about ambition or even about getting better. It’s far simpler than that. It’s the acknowledgement of the present, where we are and where our art stands. If we make mistakes and learn from them, it’s a good day. Then we move on to the next piece, idea or dream. We keep working.

“Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards.” ― Søren Kierkegaard, Philosopher